Thursday, December 31, 2009

31 December 2009

Sunspots Observed

The sunspots are back. I have done a little naked-eye observing but none of the spots have been big enough for me to see them.

Observing Hours for the Year 2009

 DayNightTotal
HoursDaysAvgHoursDaysAvgHoursDaysAvg
Jan0.5020.250.2510.250.7520.38
Feb2.75110.252.5090.282.25140.38
Mar0.0000.04.0070.574.0070.57
Apr0.2510.250.7520.381.0020.50
May1.2520.630.2510.251.5030.50
Jun0.0000.000.5010.500.5010.50
Jul0.5010.500.5010.501.0020.50
Aug0.5020.2515.5053.1016.0062.67
Sep1.0011.0027.0073.8628.0083.50
Oct0.0000.0011.0061.8311.0061.83
Nov1.0011.0023.5082.9424.5092.72
Dec0.7520.383.2540.814.0050.80
TOTAL8.50230.3789.00521.7196.25641.50

Monday, December 28, 2009

28 December 2009

Cartes du Ciel graphic

The Moon passed through the Pleiades tonight for the last time until 2024. Peter was talking about maybe going north to get a grazing occultation of Alcyone. I figured out enough of Occult 4 to get a graze path and limb profile. We would have to go up to Orange county, which is no big deal. But the limb isn't very exciting. There are one or two small valleys on the western limb. They are so small that it would be hard to be sure of getting to the right place to see a flash. There is one big valley, probably a crater rim, on the east limb that should be easier to hit. But it looks like it will be a brief flash followed by a long wait for a reappearance or a long wait for a brief flash then a reappearance. There doesn't appear to be anywhere where we could see multiple flashes.

annotated Occult 4 graphic

It has been overcast and windy most of the day so isn't a night for trying to observe anyway.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

23 December 2009

Observing LocationGreeley Sq., New York, NY
Lat.: 40.748963
Long.: -73.988185
Observational Period0630-0645 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature20° F
WindLight Breeze
Wind Chill Effect9° F
Humidity Moderate
Barometric Pressure30.18" Hg
Rising slowly
Feels LikeCold

TransparencyExcellent
Seeing  
InstrumentsNaked-eye - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway
0538 ESST
Astronomical Twilight begins
0612
Astronomical Twilight ends
Nautical Twilight begins

TargetISS Visible Pass
ConstellationGem, Com, Lib
CategorySatellite
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091223.0636 EST
Comments
  StartsMax. Alt.Ends
H A
e b
a o
v v
e e
n   
s   
Time0636:06 EST0638:50 EST0641:38 EST
Alt.11°74°10°
Az.WNWSWSE
Mag-3.4
C
a
l
S
k
y
Time0635:26 EST0638:16 EST0643:03 EST
Alt.10.1°75.0°horizon
Az.303.5°
WNW
218.0°
SW
131.1°
SE
Mag-2.2-4.53.0
The ISS appeared from behind 1 Penn Plaza and slowly moved across the island until it disappeared behind a corner of Manhattan Mall. It took forever to reappear and move across Broadway and 6 Ave where it disappeared behind the Radddison Hotel (back in the old days this was the Martinique Hotel, a welfare hotel that Red Cross used for fire victims and there were many murders committed there). I moved a little further south toward 32 St and picked it up again until it disappeared into the eastern skyline. It was very bright throught the pass and appeared to move very slowly.
0646 EST
Nautical Twilight ends
Civil Twilight begins
0717 EST
Civil Twilight ends
Sunrise


While trying to get my bearings with my compass I watched the needle swing from north down toward west then through 45° back through north and over toward east. Just after that I felt the rumble of a subway train under my feet.

Monday, December 21, 2009

21 December 2009

Observing LocationMcGraw Hill Building
Observational Period1100-1230 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverScattered Clouds
mostly scattered between the Sun and the Sun Triangle
Temperature 34° F
WindGentle Breeze Breeze
Wind Chill Effect21° F
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure2988" Hg
Falling
Feels Like Cool

TransparencyGood
Seeing 
InstrumentsNaked-eye w/Shade 5 + Shade 10 welder’s filters- Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sun Aligned with McGraw-Hill Sun Triangle
and
December Solstice
ConstellationSgr
CategorySolar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091221.1200
and
20091221.1247 EST
Comments
Distance
Light Time
0.98374012 AU
8m s
Angular Size31' 34.1"
Altitude25.5°
Heliographic Latitude
(B0)
-1.76°
Heliographic Longitude
(L0)
168.40°
Parallactic Angle
(P)
7.05°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2091

There are three groups of spots on the sun today.Group 1035 is rotating off the NW limb. Group 1036 is in the SW quadrant and still close enough to the center of the Sun's disk that I should have been able to have seen it if it were large enough and my eyes good enough. Group 1037 has rotated onto the disk in the NE quadrant and is almost far enough onto the disk that it should shortly become visible.

 Groups SpotsR
North0 0 0
South0 0 0
Total0 0 0
R = (Groups * 10) + Spots)

The Sun Triangle does not work on the Winter Solstice. It isn't because the triangle is defective but rather because They built a newer building (1212) that blocks the sun until about 1205 EST by which time it is already past and below the lower arm of the triangle. When I arrived at 1130 EST all of the plaza except for the building entrance was in shadow from that building and coupled with the clouds it didn't look like there would be sun in the plaza by noon. As the hour approached the clouds moved off but the building didn't.

December Solstice = Winter

Cartes du Ciel
At 1247 EST this afternoon it officially became winter. I thought that happened a week ago when I had to stop wearing shorts.

I used to call this the Winter Solstice but I have been seeing it referred to as the December Solstice this year and realized that, although it sounds strange, that is really a better name for it since in the southern hemisphere it is just becoming summer. So from now on, whenever I can remember to do it, I will be referring to solstices and equinoxes by the month during which they occur rather than the northern hemisphere season they usher in.

I noticed that the Sun is not sitting right on R.A. 18:00 at the time of the solstice. It doesn't reach there for 3h 45m. I suspect that this is because Earth is getting close to perihelion and will be moving faster all the time until it gets there in accordance with Kepler's second law (equal area over equal time).

Cartes du Ciel graphic

Friday, December 18, 2009

18 December 2009

I had planned to get up at 0430 this morning to go out and try to observe a double flare from SkyMed1 and a half dozen other satellites before the start of Civil Twilight. When I got home last night I adjusted the alarm for the appropriate time, but I guess I was so tired I forgot to turn it on and woke up late this morning.

Tonight I will have a better shot at the crescent Moon, this time 2.4 days and 5.2% illuminated. But there is a storm headed this way. I think the storm is coming from the south so maybe I will luck out and it will be clear to the west.



Observing LocationCentral Park
  • Wollman Memorial Skating Rink
    Lat.: 40.788431
    Long.: -73.973585
  • Bethesda Fountain
    Lat.: 40.773847
    Long.: -73.971009
  • Sheep Meadow
    Lat.: 40.772782
    Long.: -73.973740
  • SW Corner
    Lat.: 40.768845
    Long.: -73.980134
Observational Period1645-1730 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverOvercast
The Central Park automated weather station is reporting that it is clear but here is the picture from their own satellite that puts the lie to that report.
Intellicast graphic
Temperature29
WindCalm
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure30.15" Hg
Steady
Feels Like Cool

TransparencyPoor
Seeing 
InstrumentsNaked-eye - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetDay 2 Crescent Moon
Constellation
CategoryLunar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
2009 EST
Comments
Lunation1076
PhaseWaxing Crescent
Age2.34
Distance
Light Time
(from earth)
402,280 km
s
Elongation°
% Illuminated5.0%
Morning Terminator Colongitude (λ E)294.7°
Evening Terminator Colongitude (λ W)114.7°
Libration in Latitude0° 34'
Libration in Longitude0° 49'
Magnitude-7.19
Angular Size29.70'"
Altitude23° 45'
Virtual Moon Atlas graphic

I got a notice that the library had a couple of holds ready for me so went over there and along the way realized that it was already time to go to Central Park for another attempt at the crescent Moon and I didn’t have any ephemeris information with me again. It looked like it might be cloudy but it was already dark enough that it was hard to be certain (that doesn’t absolve the National Weather Service of their persistent bade reports for central park – if they are going to make a report they should have figured out how to get it right). I went up to the park after claiming my holds and printing out the satellite passes for the next week.

My first stop was on top of Cat Rock, a large outcrop above Wollman Rink at 1645. I couldn’t see anything and thought that it must be cloudy. The sky was a smoky gray in color. I couldn’t even find Jupiter. I thought that it was possible that the Moon was low enough that the buildings around the park were blocking it so decided to press on toward TotL.

I have found that it is a little leveler walking north through the Mall than along the road and tonight was going to try going down to Bethesda Fountain and out by the Boathouse to see if that leveled my route out some more. When I got to the overlook above the fountain I looked back to the south and saw a very subdued Jupiter shining through obvious clouds. I gave up on the Moon and headed toward the Sheep Meadow to get to the west side park drive.

While walking across the top of the Sheep Meadow something caught my eye and when I looked there was a crescent Moon shining dimly through the clouds over the CNN billboard. That was at 1712 EST. I had forgotten that Mercury was east of the sun so didn’t think to look for him but with the clouds it wouldn’t have mattered anyway. It wasn’t worth looking for anything else so I continued on my route home

Stellarium graphic
Stellarium graphic

I don't think this is anywhere near a record young crescent for me but it is probably the earliest crescent I have found naked-eye without someone else telling me exactly where to look for it.

I got to the SW corner of the park at about 1720 and decided that since it was that late I might as well invest another nine minutes and take a shot at an Iridium flare.

TargetIridium 91 Flare
Constellation
CategorySatellite
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091218.1729 EST
Comments
1729:27 EST
 Heavens
Above
CalSky
Iridium #9091
Time1729: EST
Alt.60°°
Az.50°
NE
°
NE
Mag.-1
Surface 
I compared my watch with the CNN billboard and the times were in good agreement so I decided to use the billboard to signal the one-minute warning. I practiced counting seconds and was nearly dead on so at 1728 EST I turned around to look where I thought the flare might occur and started counting off 89 seconds to the flare. At about 1729 I saw a bright satellite coming brom behind me which was headed north and faded as I looked. This appears to be another case where the predictions are in error. I just checked my watch with the NBST official US time web page, which says it currently has an accuracy of &plusmi;0.1 second, and my watch is about 2 seconds slow. There were also two other flares listed on CalSky a couple of days ago and there were no flares listed for tonight when I checked the site at the library.



NOAA has a winter storm warning up for NYC beginning tomorrow morning. They have increased their accumulated snowfall amount b the end of the storm on Sunday to 8 to 12 inches on the ground.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

17 December 2009

I got news today about scientists finding an Earth-like planet orbiting a Sun-like star, but the article didn’t say where it is so I can at least observe the star if not the planet. After digging I found that the star is GJ 1214 in Ophiuchus. That isn’t a terribly bright part of the sky but if I can find travel directions maybe we can hop there some night.

Here is a 1° map centered on the R.A. and Dec. of GJ 1214. I guess the fact that nothing appears there is understandable since this star/sun appears to have just been discovered.

Catres du Ciel graphic

This map of Ophiuchus shows roughly where the GJ 1214b should be since the label for SLE 17 is a carryover from the 1° view. Since the Sun is currently in Oph it is going to be a while before we can look for GJ 1214.



Other stars that have been recently found to be exo-suns (and ones that we might be able to find - one is even a naked-eye object) with super-Earths (planets 1-10 times as massive as the Earth) include:

61 Virginis

Mag. 4.74
R.A. 13h 18m 24.30s
Dec. -18° 18' 49.0"

23 Librae

Mag. 6.45
R.A. 15h 13m 18.70s
Dec. -25° 20' 45.4"

HD 1465 (HR 72)

Mag. 6.46
R.A. 00h 18m 41.87s
Dec. -08° 03' 10.8"
These might be interesting things to show passers-by since they are in the news.



The BBC is reporting that NASA has measured the coldest temperature of anywhere in the Solar System where they have been able to make measurements and it is practically in our back yard. They measured temperatures inside the rims of lunar craters where the Sun never shines. Because they are so close to the poles and are so deep the rays of the sun are blocked by the rim and in the winter the temperature bottomed out at 26 K (absolute zero is 0 K). The coldest crater was Hemite with Peary and Bosch as close runners up. I was able to find Hemite and Peary on the north polar regions plate USGS Geologic Lunar Atlas but I can't find a reference anywhere to tell me where to go looking for Bosch.

detail from USGS Geologic Lunar Atlas, North Side of the Moon
In this piece of the map the north lunar pole and Hemite and Bosch are in the upper right corner. The rest of the map is there to give them some context since we can't observe them but do see some of the craters along the bottom of the map.




There is a giant sunspot up there today that Space Weather says is eight times as large as the earth. From the pictures it looks like it should be visible without optics.



Observing Location10 Ave @ 52 St, New York, NY
Long.:
Lat.:
Observational Period1445-1500 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Temperature30
WindLight Breeze
gusting to
Gentle Breeze
Wind Chill Effect22° F
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure30.25" Hg
Steady
Feels LikeCold

TransparencyExcellent
Seeing 
InstrumentsNaked-eye w/shade 10 + shade 5 glass welder’s filter lenses- Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Target Sunspots
ConstellationOpn
CategorySolar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1445 EST
Comments
Distance
Light Time
0.9841 AU
8m s
Angular Size32.5'
Altitude14° 20'
Heliographic Latitude
(B0)
-1.27°
Heliographic Longitude
(L0)
219.59°
Parallactic Angle
(P)
+8.86°
Carrington rotation number
(CR)
2091

I know they are out there, I saw them on the Web, but I can’t see them. They are actually it, one group of spots in the NW quadrant of the Sun. At eight times the size of the earth I think they should be seeable without magnification but suspect that they are too close to the limb for me to see them with my eyesight.

 Groups SpotsR
North0 0 0
South0 0 0
Total0 0 0
R = (Groups * 10) + Spots)



Observing LocationTotL
Observational Period1625-1800 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverClear
Althought it is officially clear in NOAA parlance there is a stripe of cloud indicating a front moving in from the west that is right above the treeline where I need to see. There is also a generalized thin cloud/haze/smog.
Temperature28° F
WindGentle Breeze
gusting to
Moderate Breeze
Wind Chill Effect18&def; F
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure3028" Hg
Rising
Feels LikeCold

TransparencyGood
Seeing 
InstrumentsNaked-eye - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetFirst Crescent Moon
ConstellationSgr
CategoryLunar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1630 EST
Comments
Lunation1076
PhaseWaxing Crescent
Age1.40d
Distance
Light Time
(from earth)
402,216 km
s
Elongation14° 57' 35.5"
% Illuminated1.8%
Morning Terminator Colongitude (λ E)283.2°
Evening Terminator Colongitude (λ W)76.8°
Libration in Latitude+1° 48'
Libration in Longitude+1° 41'
Magnitude-1.70
Angular Size29.71'
Altitude6° 17'
Virtual Moon Atlas graphic
Not Seen
I knew going out that this was going to be a difficult and probably futile attempt. The ecliptic is fairly shallow and the Moon is below it. I didn’t help myself any by going out unprepared. I hadn’t gotten an azimuth on either the Moon or Sun at sunset or an elongation of the Moon. And I arrived later than I had planned so didn’t get to see where the Sun was setting. Add to that the stripe of clouds moving out of the west right where I think the ecliptic was.
Stellarium graphic

TargetJupiter
ConstellationCap
CategoryPlanet
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1700 EST
Comments
Object
Class
Classical Planet
Elongation57° 33' 59.4"
Distance
Light Time
(from Earth)
5.4653 AU
m s
Distance
(from Sun)
5.0668 AU
Angular Size36.0"
Magnitude-2.2
Central Meridian
I/II/III
141.00°/76.31°/206.64°
Altitude32° 42' 31"
Moons
Stellarium graphic
Jupiter was either the second or third “star” that I say tonight. I don’t remember whether I saw Jupiter or Deneb first. Although Jupiter is much brighter it is in an area of the sky where I wasn’t concentrating my vision. In the short time I was there it seemed to have moved across a considerable distance in the sky but I might have helpe that impression along when I changed my location. Neptune was there right beside Jupiter but too faint to be seen without optics.
Carted su Ciel graphic

TargetIridium 29 Flare
ConstellationCam
CategorySatellite
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1728 EST
Comments
&nbsl;CalSky
Time1728:14 EST
Alt.29.3°
Az.23.6°
NNE
Mag.-3.0
Surfacesolar panels
I am not sure whether or not I saw this satellite. I had set an alarm to give me a one-minute warning for the event and shortly before the alarm went off I saw a bright satellite falling between Mirfac and Algol. It continued to fall to the north and seemed to be dimming. I was wondering if I might be witnessing an unpredicted double flare but as it fell past Cas into Cam it winked out and never came back. If this was Iridium 29 the time and location of the flare were way off. If it wasn’t then I didn’t see Iridium 29 at all and what did I see?

TargetIridium 31 Flare
ConstellationPer
CategorySatellite
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1735 EST
Comments
 Heavens
Above
CalSky
Time1735:33 EST1735:32 EST
Alt.61°61.1°
Az.47°
NE
46.3°
NE
Mag.-4-4.0
Surface MMA2
This flare occurred at the right place and time. It was very bright and appeared to jump around like a UFO, which I attribute to the interaction of the light reflected from it with the cloud that light was passing through.

Targetε Aur
ConstellationAur
CategoryDouble Star
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1740 EST
Commentsε Aur is definitely fainter than either η Aur or ζ Aur. I had to work at finding ε while ζ was always much easier to locate (maybe because it is nearer to η shich is currently the brightest of the Kids).
Stellarium graphic

TargetAlgol, β Per
ConstellationPer
CategoryDouble Star
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1745 EST
CommentsAlgol is much brighter than ρ Per tonight.
Stellarium graphic

TargetResurs 1-4 Flare
ConstellationPer
CategorySatellite
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.1758 EST
Comments
 CalSky
Time1758:33 EST
Alt.38.8°
Az.68.4°
ENE
Mag.0.5
Just as my one-minute warning went off I saw a satellite in Per. I suspect that this was Resurs 1-4 but the timing is off again although the location was reasonable.

Even though there was some atmosphere I saw a lot of stars and identified almost everything I saw.

I saw both geese and ducks flying over the Great Lawn for the first time this season. We have been told by one of the dog walkers that the Parks Department was trying to hire dogs to chase the birds off trying to rid the park of them.



I keep forgetting to write about it, but the trees at Broadway and 34 St are decorated with strings of white LEDs arrayed in tubes. There is software on a controlling circuitry that causes then to light from the top of the string to the bottom, each string probably having about 20 LEDs and many strings in each tree. There is a sustain to the lights so there is a stripe of light that appears to travel down each tube bleed off from top to bottom as the lighting progresses. I suppose it is supposed to look like light shining on icicles but to me it looks like shooting stars. It is a nice effect.



Observing LocationDrip Rock
Observational Period2150-2215 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverScattered Clouds (I think)
Conditions seem to have worsened over the last two hours. I can see areas if the sky where there appear to be clouds but I am still seeing a lot of stars.
Temperature21° F
Wind Light Breeze
Wind Chill Effect14° F
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure30.30" Hg
Steady
Feels Like Cold

TransparencyGood
Seeing 
InstrumentsNaked-eye - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

TargetMars
ConstellationLeo
CategoryPlanet
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091217.2200 EST
Comments
Object
Class
Classical Planet
Elongation126° 35 52.2" E
Distance
Light Time
(from Earth)
0.8225 AU
m s
Distance
(from Sun)
1.6155 AU
Angular Size11.4"
Magnitude-0.4
Central Meridian 104.64°
Altitude15° 19’
Stellarium Graphic

Meridian graphic
This was my first attempt at observing the red planet in the night sky. I am reasonably certain that waht I saw was Mars. It was big and bright and had a slight orange tinge to it. I couldn’t find Regulus but the angular relationship between what I took to be Algieba and Alnilam and the distance relationship between where I thought Regulus should have been and Pollux was right.
Stellarium graphic

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

16 December 2009

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

15 December 2009

I took another stab at trying to detect the perturbation of Earth’s orbit due to its revolution about the Earth/Moon barycenter. I thought that if the Earth goes into retrograde motion once a month it should show up in the position of the sun along the ecliptic. I reasoned that the distance the Sun “moves” along the ecliptic should be lesser on those days and should show up in a plot of the Sun’s location as a string of data points that are closer together and that this should repeat at the same time during each lumation. I plotted the Sun’s azimuth at noon on each day of lunations 1077 and 1078 (15Jan10-15Mar10).

From the plot it is evident that all I am plotting is the motion of the sun along the analemma. The plot gets a bit jagged as it reaches the western elongation (west of 175°) but I think this is probably due to the precision with which Catres du Ciel (my data source) displays the Sun’s location. The Sun covers more distance (178.6° to 177°) during lunation 1077 than it does during lunation 1078 (177° to 178.3°) but this is due to the fact that during lunation 1077 it is trying to get to western elongation and during lunation 1078 it is spending time there then trying to get away.

Analemma.exe graphic

I am confident that if the data were plotted for the rest of the year the line would curve right to eastern elongation then bend back to the west.

Any variation in the Earth’s orbit due to its revolution around the Earth/Moon barycenter is too subtle for me to illustrate with the tools at my disposal. This must be due to the closeness or the relative barycenter to the Earth’s center.


While I was gathering my data in Cartes du Ciel I found that on 14Feb10 the Moon, Venus, and Jupiter will be in a tight cluster (within a ~6° circle) just east of the Sun (~7°), Neptune will be in conjunction with the Sun, and Mercury will not be too far off to the west (~20°). Uranus is also on that side of the sky ~29° east of the Sun. So all of those bodies will be within ~49° of each other.

Cartes du Ciel graphic

Then on 10Mar10 Venus and Uranus will be to the east of the Sun (14° and ~6° respectively), Mercury and Jupiter will be closer out to the west (~4° and ~8° respectively), and Neptune ~23° west making all of these bodies within ~37° of each other.

Assuming a Ptolemaic view of the Solar System,

that puts a lot of mass in one section of the celestial sphere.

 14Feb1010Mar10
 
Meridian graphic
Meridian graphic
Gathered
 Mass x1012 kgMass x1012 kg
Sun1,988,420,101,200,000,0001,988,420,101,200,000,000
Mercury330,107,382,800330,107,382,800
Venus4,867,372,861,0004,867,372,861,000
Moon73,458,060,000 
Jupiter1,898,162,242,600,0001,898,162,242,600,000
Uranus86,811,899,200,00086,811,899,200,000
Neptune102,417,257,800,000102,417,257,800,000
Total Mass102,417,257,800,000
99.97%
1,990,512,690,079,840,000
99.97%
Dispersed
Moon 73,458,060,000
Mars641,694,973,400641,694,973,400
Saturn568,417,257,800,000568,417,257,800,000
Total Mass568,974,163,573,400
0.03%
569,047,621,633,400
0.03%

With all that mass on one side of the solar system might something happen?

  • Might the plane of the solar system tilt and the stars not appear in their normal places?
  • Might we have higher than normal tides?
  • Might we not be here to see if the world ends on 21Dec12?


And at noon on 16Feb10 Venus and Jupiter will be conjuncted (the actual time of conjunction in R.A. is ~1630 EDT when the two planets will be separated by 34’ 18”, a little more than a Moon diameter) and ~9° east of the Sun so the conjunction might be visible all day with optics if one was to be careful. Venus and Jupiter rise that morning after sunrise and set within five minutes of sunset so there will be no opportunity to see the conjunction in a dark sky.

Cartes du Ciel graphic

Monday, December 14, 2009

14 December 2009

While reading Rukl I came across a listing of mare basins in the order of formation so decided to plot them.

The chart displays older craters on top of younger ones where they overlap.

There are basically an equal number of basins on the nearside and farside (11:12) but the nearside basins have nearly half again as much area as the farside basins (18,996,253 square kilometers:13,221,902 squarekilometers).

Sunday, December 13, 2009

13 December 2009

I transcribed some of the collar data from the nearside plate of the USGS Geologic Lunar Atlas to get a general background on what we see.
GEOLOGIC SUMMARY
MARIA AND MULTI-RING BASINS

The circular basins, generally encompassed by three or more partly complete scarps or ring systems, dominate the geology of the Moon’s near side. Diameters of the innermost ring range from 250 to 600 km (kilometers), and the spacing of the three rings increases from one to the next by a regular ratio (Hartmann and Kuiper, 1962). The observed and inferred crest lines of the most important of these structures are shown by brown lines on the accompanying map. The depressed central parts of the basins and the concentric troughs which lie between successive rings are completely or partially filled with dark plains material (mare) which is younger than the basins and which appears to have been emplaced in a fluid and probably molten state. These basins and their subsequent mare fill have destroyed large parts of the earlier geologic record, and in this respect have acted like terrestrial orogenies. The historical geology of the Moon can be understood only in terms of these dominant, primitive structures which, if ever present on Earth, have long since been obliterated or deeply buried and severely modified.

The general circularity of the basins, the textural similarity of the materials of the ring structures, and the regularity of the ring spacing suggest a common origin. If all basin-related features are considered, particularly for the best preserved basins, an impact origin, as first suggested by Gilbert (1893), is strongly favored. The inner rugged rings of the two best preserved basins, Orientale (just outside the map area) and Imbrium, are surrounded by distinctive ejecta blankets (Hevelius Formation and Fra Mauro Formation respectively) which can be traced outward for hundreds of kilometers. Relicts of what is probably a third, more degraded and older ejecta blanket (Janssen Formation) can be recognized south of the Nectaris basin. Within and beyond these blankets, chains and clusters of craters have been identified as probable secondary impact craters on the basis of morphology, size, and distance from basin (see section on crater materials). Observable differences among basins -- such as the presence or absence of a recognizable blanket, the completeness of the concentric ring structures, the freshness and relief of the rings, the character of the radial structures, and the type and numbers of superposed craters -- can be explained by variations in relative age, degree of filling by younger mare, or proximity to younger basins. Alternative explanations for the multi-ring basins calling for an internal origin (Spurr, 1944; Green, in Oriti and Green, 1967) are inadequate because of failure to account for all of the basins’ observable properties, relative ages, and relations to subjacent and superposed units such as the maria.

A considerable body of stratigraphic evidence shows that mare material in the basins is not the immediate and direct product of the basin-forming impact but is a later volcanic fill: (1) The mare truncates all other basin-related deposits and structures. (2) It is located in basin-related topographic lows, including troughs between the outer rings far from the basin centers. (3) The mare surface materials in all basins appear to have a narrower age range (determined from the number of superposed craters) than the basins, which differ greatly in state of preservation and apparent relative age. (4) Craters are superposed on the basin ejecta or basin-related structures but are embayed or filled by mare material occur in every basin (for example, Posidonius, Gassendi, Cleomedes, and Fracastorius in the Serenitatis, Humorum, Crisium, and Nectaris basing respectively). The postbasin, premare craters within the Imbrium basin (that is, Imbrian-age craters) are approximately equal in number to the total number of postmare craters (Eratosthenian and Copernican ages) in the same area. Thus a considerable interval between basin formation and final mare filling is suggested. (5) A distinct geologic unit, light plains material (Ip), lies stratigraphically between the deposits of the Imbrium basin and postbasin, premare crater materials, including those of Archimedes, Cassini, and Plato. (6) Features far from and unrelated to the Imbrium basin are also of Imbrian age, demonstrating an extensive history between the formation of the basin and the last mare fill. Orientale is one such Imbrian-age feature, and many Imbrian craters apart from those in the Imbrium basin both predate and postdate Orientale. (7) The nearside basins are filled by mare to varying structural levels independently of their size. For example, Nectaris is filled to the first ring and Crisium and Imbrium to the second and third respectively. Uneven filling suggests different volumes of mare material in each, reflecting internal rather than external (impact melting) controls on their filling.

Each basin immediately after excavation and early gravitational slumping probably resembled the present youthful-appearing Orientale basin (McVauley, 1967b, -. 439-446; 1968). Orientale is the key to the internal configuration of the more degraded and deeply filled basins because of its lack of extensive mare filling and its relative youth. Its present shallow profile suggests that the thickness of the mare fill even in more deeply flooded and obscured basins like Imbrium is on the order of only 2 to 5 km. Mare material, although covering almost 30 percent of the nearside surface (and very little of the far side) is, therefore, volumetrically a small part of the Moon (radius 1738 km). The deeply flooded basins like Imbrium may lie in regions where potential source material was at shallower depth than it was in the less filled basins like Orientale and Nectaris. The existence of numerous thalassoids (basins without mare fill) on the far side of the Moon (Lipinskit, 1965) further supports the conclusion that the location of a basin and local crustal conditions determine the degree of later flooding.

Oceanus Procellarum is unusual because of its non-circular, somewhat irregular shape. It is the largest expanse of mare on the Moon that is not obviously controlled by a single circular multi-ringed basin. It contains throughout most of its extent, numerous terra islands and large ghost or vestigial craters such as the Flamsteed ring which collectively suggests that the mare is relatively shallow. Its overall shape however, appears to be controlled by outer ring structure of the Imbrium basin and two vague, ancient ring structures centered near Copernicus and Flamsetted which were identified during this work.

During and after the period of flooding, meteorite bombardment eroded and subdued the basin rings and blankest through direct hits, impact of far-flung secondary ballistic fragments (Shoemaker, 1965), and seismic shaking of the surrounding terrain triggering downslope movement of loose materials (Titley, 1966). This process led to the eventual disappearance of the distinctive depositional textures of the circumbasin blankets. Catastrophic premature aging and partial obliteration of basins is exemplified by Serenitatis, whose rings have been disturbed structurally and mantled by ejecta from the nearby Imbrium basin. The trend of the younger Imbrium rings has in turn been influenced by the presence of the earlier Serenitatis structure as seen in the change in the trend of the “Apennine” ring in the Montes Caucasus region.

TERRA PLAIN, PLATEAU, AND DOME MATERIALS
Prior to formation of the youngest mare material, the basins were also modified by the deposition of several types of distinctive terra units described in detail in the accompanying explanation. The most extensive of these are the light terra plains materials of Imbrian age (unit Ip) which lie predominantly in circumscribed throughs and on the floors of pre-Imbrian and lower Imbrian craters. Plains identified as pre-Imbrian (pIp) by superposition of lowermost Imbrian crater clusters occupy more restricted areas in the southern terra. These two marelike plains units may represent earlier generations of volcanism and crustal flooding, their present high albedo relative to the mare material being due either to initial compositional differences or to more extensive churning and consequent brightening by prolonged meteorite bombardment. The most distinctive terra unit (hilly and furrowed material, Ihf) forms level or shieldlike plateaus that cover basin ejecta and postbasin craters and contain numerous small primary volcanic landforms. The two largest occurrences lie west of Nectaris between the third and fourth rings and narrowest of Humorum athwart and beyond the third ring. These plain and plateau units, which apparently modify earlier basin or crater deposits, suggest a more extensive history of lunar volcanism than previously recognized. Moreover, they differ markedly in albedo and roughness from the dark, relatively smooth mare volcanic deposits and they may thus represent the products of a distinct terra magma or of mare magma contaminated by terra materials. The bulk differences in composition from the maria could, however, be minor, as in the case of terrestrial cone and flow materials within the same volcanic field. The distribution of the terra volcanic units is controlled predominantly by basin ring structures; some occur at the intersection of younger rings structures with vague circular depressions which are the probable relicts of very ancient basins. In addition to these more extensive deposits, several types of domes, mostly in the 10 km size range, have been identified both in the maria (units Emd, Emp) and in the terrae (units Id, CEd). Many of these, including the largest and most distinctive, the postmare terra domes of the Gruithuisen area southwest of Sinus Iridum, lie along circumbasin ring structures.

CRATER MATERIALS
Craters of all ages, mostly circular, dominate the lunar landscape at all scales. The circular craters, except those deeply buried or in a poor state of preservation because of their antiquity, have physiographic characteristics that indicate an explosive origin (Baldwin, 1949, 1963). Their cumulative frequency distributions are difficult to explain by a volcanic model (Green, 1962) but do fit well with an impact model (Baldwin, 1963). The circular craters, probably of primarily impact origin, are here grouped in a “main sequence” divided into eight age categories.

Foremost among the craters not grouped in the “main sequence” are chains and clusters of 10-15 km bowl-shaped or irregular craters lying within and beyond the confines of the Hevelius Formation (out to 1500 km from the Orientale basin center) and confidently identifies as secondary impact craters formed by ejecta from the Orientale basin unit Isc). Similar but larger, less well preserved clusters and chains of clearly Imbrian craters can be identified on the pre-Imbrian terrae as probable secondary craters of the Imbrium basin (unit Icc). Many degraded or partly buried pre-Imbrian chains and clusters (unit pIch) near the edge of the Janssen Formation may be secondary craters of the moderately well preserved Nectaris basin. Thus secondary craters of large basins constitute an important part of the total lunar crater population in the 10-25 km size range on the older parts of the terrae. A few smooth, low-rimmed craters such as Lassell and Damoiseau, mostly in the 20 to 30 km range, lack impact characteristics and could be calderas (unit Ics). Certain irregular craters and clusters and chains of smooth-rimmed craters that are controlled by local or regional structural trends are also considered to be volcanic features. Most of these are relatively small and relatively young (units Ich, Ici, CEch, CEci), but some large irregular craters (pIci) and chains (pIch) of probable pre-Imbrian age could also be volcanic, suggesting a possible early epoch of crater-forming volcanism.

A number of craters, particularly those of the older subdued variety such as Pitatus, exhibit numerous superposed volcanic landforms such as domes and crater chains (mostly too small to be mapped as separate features). The presence of these landforms suggests either that the host craters are volcanic or that impact scars may be the loci of long-subsequent volcanism even for features much smaller than basins.

GEOLOGIC HISTORY
From these regional observations and interpretations a geological history of the Moon can be extensively defined. The relative ages of the multi-ring basins can be partly established by overlap relations with one another, relative topographic freshness, and age of superposed and subajacent craters. Orientale is younger than Imbrium; Nectaris, Crisium, and Humorum are older bt difficult to date with respect to one another because of their geographic separation; Serenitatis and Fecunditatis are next in sequence, and Nubium and Tranquillitatis are the most ancient of the prominent multi-ring basins. Each basin is inferred to have undergone its own cycle of early volcanic filling, impact erosion, and mantling by thick or thin to discontinuous ejecta from nearby and distant younger basins, and each contains mare fill in various amounts. Thus the stratigraphic sections in and around each of these basins are complex and reflect variable local interplay between external and internal lunar processes.

The most primitive appearing terrain on the near side lies in the south central part of the map area extending as a wedge-shaped tract broadening from Ptolemaeus to the region of the south pole. This province consists predominantly of closely packed 100-200 km pre-Imbrian craters of the probable impact sequence along with chains and clusters of Imbrian and probably Nectaris secondary craters. The preservation of this topographically positive area, within which volcanic filling played a role of uncertain importance, is explained by its location beyond the range of extensive blanketing and structural disturbance of the recognizable circular basins.

The regions south and southeast of Mare Humorum, between Serenitatis and Crisium, and southeast of Crisium also consist of basically pre-Imbrian terrain and represent the next most primitive part of the Moon’s near side. This essentially nondescript terrain, characterized by a moderate deficiency of large pre-Imbrian craters, is considered to represent an interlayered sequence of now unrecognizable crater material, volcanic material, and basin ejecta blankets; each blanket originally resembled that around Orientale and buried much of the earlier local geological record.

The lunar stratigraphic record becomes clearer with the catastrophic formation of the Imbrium basin which began the Imbrian Period. The basin and the blanket, however, have undergone considerable modification of original textures is attributed to subsequent meteorite bombardment, but some is also due to volcanism. Extensive light plains materials filled low areas within the basin and in the troughs between rings, truncating the braided and hummocky textures of the blanket and basin radial structures. Dark blanketing material was deposited in a broad arc midway between the third and fourth Imbrium rings. Steep domes and other distinctive terra landforms were also formed. These various blanketing and filling materials range from early Imbrian to Copernican in age, further supporting the conclusion that basin modification by volcanic processes is of long duration.

Some time after formation of the Imbrium basin, extensive modification of parts of the older terrae began, especially northwest of Mare Humorum and west of Mare Nectaris. Distinctive terra landforms were formed near these older basins in greater number than near Imbrium, a fact which may reflect time dependence in their formative process, possibly magmatic differentiation as the Moon evolved.

The most widespread flooding of the depressed parts of the lunar crust occurred near the end of the Imbrian Period with the filling of most of the nearside multi-ring basins by mare material. This was followed by a less extensive episode of mare generation, terra blanketing, and volcanic mare plateau formation (as in Marius Hills), mostly in the Eratosthenian Period.

Impact cratering, at a rate probably substantially reduced from that of pre-Imbrian to early Imbrian time, continued simultaneously with these events. The most recent impacts produced the prominent ray craters such as Copernicus and Tycho, whose ejecta blankets are superposed on almost all other units. No widespread volcanic activity appears to have occurred since this cratering, although some activity, as in the Littrow region at the southeastern edge of Mare Serenitiatis, may be approximately contemporaneous with it.

GENERAL CONCLUSION
Systematic regional mapping shows the Moon to be a primitive body without the orogenic belts, mobile plates, oceanic ridges, and widespread waterlaid sedimentary deposits characteristic of the Earth’s crust. The Moon does, however, exhibit a geologically heterogenous surface with a long complex history which can be partly unraveled from existing photographic data. Geologic mapping reveals a Moon that is neither dominantly “volcanic” nor dominantly “impact” but rather one in which both processes have been operative. Most of the volcanic units are restricted to regionally depressed areas, the distribution of which is controlled by ancient multi-ring basins formed by impact relatively early in lunar history. Implicit in this historical model is that a moderate amount of magmatic fractionation and vertical differentiation took place throughout at least the middle parts of lunar history (Imbrian Period). Thus most of the present surface, although less reworked than that of the Earth, is neither primordial nor of meteoritic composition. However, even the mare rocks, which are relatively young on the lunar timescale, have been shown by preliminary results from Apollos 11 and 12 to be as old or older than any presently dated terrestrial rocks. Thus the geologic record of the Moon appears to complement that of the Earth by covering the period of time for which the record is missing on Earth.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

10 December 2009

The Earth and Moon revolve around a barycenter part way from the Earth’s center to its surface.

This should result in a bicycle wheel orbit (a mark placed on the rim of a bicycle wheel will appear to move backwards when it is closest to the ground as the bicycle rolls past the observer) for the Earth around the sun. Viewed from the Sun the Earth would go into retrograde motion once a month. I had hoped to demonstrate this graphically but it appears that the effect is too subtle to appear in my charts.

The radar chart makes it appear that at apogee the orbit is nice and rounded but at perigee the turnaround is instantaneous. This is not the case. The chart should be a nice rounded curve on both ends. It appears sharply pointed at perigee because apogee is closer to the center of the circle where the triangle created by the angle of a day’s movement is smallest. If graphed out lineally the chart should be a smooth sine curve.

Making a linear chart of a portion of the same data only exacerbated the effect and I don't know why. Now both apogee and perigee appear as instantaneous changes in direction of the orbit.

? Over the period of a lunation can I demonstrate a change in the rate of Sun/Earth distance that is repeatable with Moon phase?

About half way through entering data points into Excel I realized that I was entering the wrong data. I decided to plot three lunations but realize that what I was trying to show would be masked by the change in the speed of the Moon at perihelion and aphelion. When I thought this project up in the middle of the night I had thought of this and decided to start the plot at perihelion and run it to aphelion. My hope was that in the center of the plot, and maybe even at the ends of it, there would be some wavering in the rate of distance change.

The plot that resulted from the first attempt is interesting in that there seems to be a connection between the distance and rage of change. The two graphs for each lunation bottom out about 6 days apart, distance followed by rate of change. The peaks appear to be on a cycle of around 8 days but there is only one lunation that has peaks for both distance and rate of change so I can’t be sure of the average displacement of the two peaks. The left end of the rate of change graphs is strange. The end of the Lunation 1077 chart (light blue) should flow smoothly into the Lunation 1078 chart (salmon) and the Lunation 1078 likewise into Lunation 1079 (light green) but instead the left end of each plot is sharply angled for some reason. The only thing I can figure is that it relates somehow to what time the moon was listed as 0.00 days in Virtual Moon Atlas. I found that once I found this time I could advance the day by 1 to get to 1.00 days and again by one day to 2.00 days all the way through to 29.00 days all without changing the hours, minutes or seconds. But at the end of the lunation it did not increment nicely to 0.00 days of the next lunation. I had to manually back the time setting up to get to 0.00 and I suspect that the funny left end of the line is an artifact of that change.

For my next attempt I looked up the date and time of perihelion in my Observers Handbook 2010 and set Virtual Moon Atlas to the local time equivalent. Then I played with the minutes until I found the lowest distance number and started taking data from there. I just incremented the calendar by 1 day and continued taking data until the distance began to decrease then moved to the next perigee date and started the procedure over again. This plot is a lot better behaved except that the time from perigee to apogee on the third iteration is three days shorter than the others. But any perturbation in the rate of change is hidden by the amount of distance covered by the moon from day to day (up to 7310 km in a day).



Observing LocationBryant Park
Observational Period1750-1815 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverBroken Clouds
NOAA had predicted a near cloudless night for tonight and it was so when I went to the library at 1700, at least to the east. But when I left there about 25 minutes later it was nearly overcast. There were some passing gaps in the cloud where the sky was deep blue so I waited until the appointed time in case it cleared off or one of those gaps just happened to be parked between me and the satellites I wanted to see. The central park automated weather station reported clear at 1451 EST and then either Mostly Cloudy or Overcast on the hourly reports through 2051 EST and appears not to have reported any observations after that time.
Temperature34° F
WindLight breeze
gusting to
Gentle Breeze
Central Park reported 12.7 MPH gusting to 19.6 mph giving a wind chill effect of 25° F and 23° F in the gusts.
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure29.73" Hg
Rising
Feels LikeVery Chilly

TransparencyNil
Seeing 
InstrumentsNaked-eye - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway
The clouds just wouldn’t cooperate. At the time of the flare the entire sky to the north was obscured.

TargetIridium 31 Double Flare
ConstellationCam
CategorySatellite
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091110.1809 EST
CommentsNot Seen
The clouds just wouldn’t cooperate. At the time of the flare the entire sky to the north was obscured.
 Heavens AboveCalsky
 First FlareSecond Flare
Time1809:21 EDT1809:21 EDT1829:28 EDT
Alt.48°47.8°46.0°
Az.40°
NE
39.7°
NE
37.1°
NE
Constellation CamCam
Mag.-1-1.70
Surface MMA2solar panels

Monday, December 7, 2009

6 December 2009

". . . It's unpleasantly like being drunk." "What's so unpleasant about being drunk?" "You ask a glass of water."

Ford Prefect and Arthur Dent
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Douglas Adams



I looked out my window at the sliver of sky I can see, which is to the east, and it was nice and blue so I got dressed to go up to Central Park and try to spot Venus. When I got to the corner I looked down 6 Ave and there were white clouds down about the altitude of the Sun and I hadn’t had lunch yet so I turned around and went back home.



I waent out to dinner with a friend and while walking across 42 St we looked up trying to ffigure out whether or not it was clear out. It looked clear. When I got home I put on long Johns and a winter jacket and went up to TotL where it was overcast with moderate stratus and thicker stripes of cloud visible in various parts of the sky. I could only find six stars and one planet in the whole sky. When I was on my way up to Columbia last Friday it looked like it was clear but as soon as I got into the campus where it is a little more open and the intensity of the area lighting isn't as great the clouds became obvious. I certainly can't judge the condition of the sky from Times Square and particularly not from my room.

Friday, December 4, 2009

4 Decemer 2009

I attended a lecture at Columbia University on debunking the World Will End in 2012 myth. Since then I have added a countdown to doomsday calendar at the top of the right column so I know when to buy more insurance.

There was supposed to be observing in the domes last night but it got too cloudy just as NOAA had predicted it would.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

1 December 2009




Observing LocationTotL
Observational Period2015-2115 EST
Atmospheric Conditions
Cloud CoverScatterd Clouds
with Haze
Temperature44° F
WindLight Breeze
The flag on Belvedere Castle is standing straight out to the SE indicating a Gentle Breeze up there.
HumidityModerate
Barometric Pressure30.10“ Hg
Rising
Feels LikeCool and Raw

TransparencyGood
SeeingThe stars are changing brightness as the clouds pass through.
InstrumentsNaked-eye - Charlie
Observing PartyCharlie Ridgway

Peter had sent me an email forwarding intelligence from John Pazmino that this lunation is the last time the Moon will pass through the Pleiades until 2024. I thought I might find him out to observe the Moon and M45 even if the transit was over so walked up to TotL on the park drive past Drip Rock in case he decided to observe there but didn’t find him at either location.

When I got home I checked the Moon’s location in Cartes du Ciel and found that the transit had been a daytime event. While I was in the program I figured out how to record a video which I was going to include here but I can't get the file size small enough to upload it.


Stellarium graphic
  • Gemini is rising laying on Pollux’s side. I can see ι Gem (Mag. 3.79), ε Gem (Mag. 2.98), ζ Gem (Mag. 3.79), ξ Gem (Mag. 3.36), ν Gem (Mag. 4.15), μ Gem (Mag. 2.88, ε Gem (Mag. 3.28) and 1 Gem (Mag. 4.16).
  • Auriga is ~50° up in the NE. ε Aur (nominally Mag 2.99) and &zetz; Aur (Mag. 3.75) are close enough in brightness that I am having trouble deciding which is the brighter but if I were forced to pick one I would have to give the nod to ε Aur. η Aur (Mag. 3.17) is definitely the brightest of the trio.
  • The Moon is to the upper left of Arcturus. I don’t see any sign of M45.
  • Orion is just starting to come out of the trees with only Betelgeuse in the clear. Later I saw Alnitak, Alnilam, and Mintaka through the trees and Rigel in the clear. I also saw π2 Ori (Mag. 3.19), π4 Ori (Mag. 3.69) and π5 (Mag.3.72) in the shield.
  • In the SSE I occasionally see η Eri (Mag. 3.89) and at roughly the same altitude in the SSW over Citicorp β Cet (Mag. 2.04)
  • Jupiter (Mag. -2.3) was near the apartment building with two towers in the W. (I think it is the one where John Lennon lived.)
  • Cygnus is setting into the dormitory tree. I can only see Deneb (Mag. 1.25), ε Cyg (Mag. 2.46), γ Cyg (Mag. 2.20) and δ Cyg (Mag. 2.87).
  • Vega is behind the tree near the lamp to the west of the observing location.
  • Cassiopeia is high overhead. I can see all five of the main stars, η Cas (Mag. 3.44) and ζ Cas (Mag. 3.66).
  • Perseus is next to Cas. I can see all three of the steeple stars, α and δ Per, β and ρ Per, and ε Per (Mag. 2.89). I also occasionally see some of the Alpha Perseus Association and something out between α and β Per. I don’t see any of the fishhook.
  • Pegasus is high in the WSW.
  • Andromeda is stretching out high overhead with only the strong chain visible.
  • The Little Dipper (UMi) is hanging from Polaris
  • I can’t find hide nor hair of the Great Bear (UMa and the Big Dipper).
  • The first bend of Draco is above the tree by the western lamp.
  • Aries is high overhead to the SE.

TargetMoon
ConstellationTau
CategoryLunar
Time
yyyymmdd.hhmm
20091201.2015 EST
Comments
Lunation1074
PhaseWaxing Gibbous
Age15.25d
Full - 7.25h
Distance
Light Time
(from earth)
363,900 km
s
Elongation°
% Illuminated99.9%
Morning Terminator Colongitude (λ E)90.1°
Evening Terminator Colongitude (λ W)270.1°
Libration in Latitude-4° 19'
Libration in Longitude-3° 28'
Magnitude-12.58
Angular Size32.8'
Altitude46° 34'
Virtual Moon Atlas graphic

When I looked in Virtual Moon Atlas I thought I must have had the date of the Full Moon wrong in my calendars. I could not see any terminator on the depiction of the Moon and that is exactly what I saw in the sky. The Moon looks like it is at the moment of being 100% illuminated. But the ephemeris data says that 0.1% of the SW limb is still in shadow.

The Moon is to the upper left of Arcturus.

Cartes du Ciel graphic

It is very bright and casts a shadow even when I am near the street light. At the normal observing location by the storm drain its shadow is darker than that of the street lights. It is bright enough that I can write my notes without having to move over to the street lights. The light it casts has a bluish cast. The uplands are so right that I am having trouble seeing the maria. I can’t really make out Mare Imbrium of Oceanus Precellarum. They are nondescript gray areas but enough there to hint at the rabbit.

Of the Man in the Moon I can see his left eye and nose and part of his lips.
With difficulty I can see the whole rabbit.
I can see the body and legs of the man carrying sticks and maybe the head, but no sticks and no dog.
I don’t see the woman at all. Each time I try I see the man.
For the face I don’t see its right eye or nose.

On the way home I stopped off at the obelisk (Cleopatra’s Needle). The elements have weathered away all of the hieroglyphics on the western face and it is dark enough that had there been anything remaining I think I would have had trouble “reading” it. The south face has had the two western columns of hieroglyphics erased but the eastern column is mostly readable. I can see it well enough to describe the glyphs. The eastern side is easy to read all the way to the top of the tower due to the moon shining on it. The northern side can be read well and it is easy to see all the glyphs even though the Moon isn’t shining full on it.

It is amazing to think that the ancient Egyptians were able to not only move something that big but stand it vertically without modern machinery.