Wednesday, April 1, 2009

1 Aapril 2009

The first of April, some do say,
Is set apart for All Fools' Day.
But why the people call it so
Nor I, nor they themselves do know.

Anonymous



When you read the books they tell you that the Bayer designations for the stars of a constellation are assigned in descending order of magnitude with α being assigned to the brightest star, the lucida, β to the next brightest, γ to the third brightest and so on. This is illustrated by the constellation Ursa Minor:

BayerProper
Name
Mag.
αPolaris2.02
βKocab2.08
γPherkad3.05

But my experience in documenting my observations and in creating my own naked-eye star atlas is that this is rarely the case. A case in point is Gemini:

BayerProper
Name
Mag.
βPollux1.14
γAlhena1.93
αCastor1.98

So I decided to use the Cambridge Photographic Star Atlas to validate my observations.

The first thing I found was that most of the literature only lists the brightest stars in any constellation down to mag. 4. So sometimes only the lucida is listed and 12 constellations don't have any stars bright enough for even the lucida to be listed. I had to go to the Web to flesh out my data since I wanted to determine the order of Bayer designations for the three brightest stars.

My quickly formed impression was that modern constellations were more likely to follow the rule than were ancient constellations so I soreted the constellations and compiled statistics that way as well as en toto.

ConstellationOrder of Brightest StarsNumberPercent
Allα5664%
α and β4147%
α β and γ1517%
lucida other than α3236%
Ancientα2657%
α and β2043%
α, β and γ613%
lucida other than α2043%
Modernα3071%
α and β2150%
α, β and γ921%
lucida other than αr1229%

As long as I had the data in Excel I sorted it by the magnitude of the lucida to see how many constellations are of each order.

LucidaNumberPercent
brighter than 0 order45%
of the 0 order89%
of the 1st order1315%
of the 2nd order2528%
of the 3rd order2630%
of the 4th order1113%
of the 5th order11%

The faintest constellation is Mensa with a lucida of only mag. 5.1.
The lucida of Leo Minor doesn't even rate a Bayer designation although it does have a propper name.

BayerProper
Name
Mag.
46 LMiPraecipea3.83


. . . at the heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes -- an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive, and the most ruthlessly sceptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new. This is how deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense.

Carl Sagan